Graeme
O'Neill
Science/medical
correspondent
Sunday
Herald-Sun.
IRON-HEART
DISEASE LINK
By
GRAEME O'NEILL
It
could literally be the bargain of your life:
donate blood three or four times times a year,
reduce your risk of heart disease by more than
50 per cent - and reduce your risk of cancer
at the same time.
If
Dr Jerome Sullivan is right, medical science
blundered three decades decades in identifying
cholesterol as a key risk factor in cardiovascular
disease. The real culprit, says Dr Sullivan,
is iron - specifically, excess iron that accumulates
in body tissues with aging.
When
Dr Sullivan, Director of Pathology at the Veterans
Affairs Hospital in Charleston, South Carolina,
first proposed in 1981 that iron is a major risk
factor in cardviovascular disease, he ran into
a wall of scepticism - mainstream medicine had
virtually accepted the cholesterol theory as
fact.
But
since then, laboratory and population-based studies
have reinforced his hypothesis, and highlighted
serious flaws in the "killer cholesterol" theory.
Several rigorous studies have failed to confirm
that cholesterol-reducing drugs significantly
reduce mortality in individuals with high serum
cholesterol levels - indeed, they may even increase
mortality.
In
1981 Dr Sullivan asked the simple question: why
don't younger women get heart disease? Even women
with hypercholesterolaemia, a hereditary condition
that causes extremely high serum cholesterol
levels, seem virtually immune to heart attack
until after menopause - even though their brothers,
with similarly high cholesterol levels, can die
in their early 20s or 30s.
But
after menopause women rapidly develop the same
risk of cardiovascular disease as men of the
same age. Women, according to medical dogma,
are protected by the main female hormone, estrogen.
Dr
Sullivan believes the real explanation is that
women do not accumulate excess iron in their
tissues until after menopause, at around age
45, because they regularly lose iron-rich haemoglobin
in menstrual blood, depleting their bodies of
iron.
Men,
on the other hand, begin accumulating excess
iron from late adolescence onwards, and male
heart disease rates rise sharply from age 20
onwards.
For
this reason, says Dr Sullivan, age and sex have
long been regarded as the major risk factors
in heart disease - and since gender is fixed
at birth, and aging is inevitable, nothing could
be done to change these factors.
But
Dr Sullivan says that these differences in heart
disease patterns between the sexes, and the increased
risk of heart attack with aging in both sexes,
are more easily explained by his toxic iron hypothesis.
"Any
iron that the body is not using to make haemoglobin
for red blood cells, or for other purposes, is
put 'on the shelf' in the form of a protein called
ferritin," Dr Sullivan said. "Ferritin
is found in all tissues of the body, and there
a little circulates in the blood, which is useful
for estimating the amount of iron stored in the
tissues."
Dr
Sullivan says his iron hypothesis does not exclude
cholesterol as a significant player in cardiovascular
disease; rather, it fits it into a more comprehensive
theory.
It
proposes that that cholesterol and lipoproteins
- blood-borne proteins that transport and deposit
fatty lipids around the body - are not the real
culprits, but victims of biochemical reactions
catalysed by iron.
These
reactions cause cholesterol and lipids to be
deposited in artery walls, and also target heart
muscle and the lining of the heart.
Dr
Sullivan says it is not clear precisely how iron
triggers these reaction, but it may be significant
that iron reacts very strongly with oxygen, producing
a highly reactive molecule called a hydroxyl
radical as a by-product.
Free
radicals are powerful oxidizing agents, and have
variously been been implicated in oxidizing cholesterol
and other lipids, disrupting chemical reactions
in cells and damaging DNA.
Heart
muscle cells may be particularly vulnerable because
they are packed with mitochondria, tiny "powerhouses" that
use energetic oxidation reactions to produce
the chemical energy that powers cells. The unusual
vulnerability of heart muscle to damage by excess
iron could be explained if hydroxyl radicals
are disrupting these vital reactions.
Given
that DNA damage leads to cancer, the iron hypothesis
may also explain a very recent finding that blood
donors are not only at lower risk of heart disease,
but are less likely to develop cancer.
While
the precise mechanism remains unclear, Dr Sullivan
has marshaled solid evidence from laboratory,
clinical and epidemiological studies to support
his idea that unused iron is toxic to the body,
especially to heart muscle.
He
notes that iron deficiency is widespread in impoverished
populations, especially among the poor in Third
World countries, which also have some of the
lowest rates of premature death from heart disease
in the world. These populations typically have
high fiber diets that impede iron absorption,
and that many individuals carry a heavy load
of gastrointestinal parasites that cause chronic
blood loss, often resulting in anemia.
In
contrast, industrialized nations have experienced
an epidemic of cardiovascular disease this century,
coinciding with the transition from difficult
to easy acquisition of stored iron - the typical
Western diet is high in iron-rich red meat, and
low in dietary fiber.
"Recent
clinical research has showed clearly that very
small amounts of iron can dramatically promote
hearte muscle injury," he said. Desferroxamine
- a drug that captures and removes excess iron
from the body - has been shown to provide significant
protection against heart-muscle damage in patients
who have already suffered a heart attack.
The
first solid evidence that regular blood donors
- especially males - have a longer life expectancy
than non-donors, emerged in 1984, only three
years after Dr Sullivan published his ideas in
the British medical journal "The Lancet" in
1981.
A
major epidemiological study of 1931 men by Dr
Jukka Salonen, of the University of Kuopio in
Finland, found that men who regularly donate
blood reduced their risk of cardiovascular disease.
Dr
Salonen has now tracked the same group of men
for 15 years, and in 1992 published another study
suggesting that smokers who regularly donate
blood significantly reduce their risk of heart
attack - the link between smoking and cardiovascular
disease has been recognised for 30 years.
The
Finnish study found that male smokers, by depleting
their stores of iron through regular blood donation,
greatly reduced their levels of oxidized serum
lipoproteins, the form in which lipids are deposited
in artery walls, causing arteriosclerosis.
A
more recent study in Germany found that people
who had suffered heart attacks had slightly elevated
levels of the iron-storage protein ferritin than
smoking males in a control group who did not
give blood, but the link was not statistically
significant.
But
Dr Sullivan says this result probably seriously
underestimates the role of excess iron in heart
disease, because male smokers in the control
group would also have had high levels of ferritin
in their tissues - for any valid conclusion,
the study group needed to be compared compared
with a control group who had no surplus iron
in their bodies.
A
marginal increase in an already high level of
stored iron the body may not significantly increase
a person's risk of heart attack; the risk threshold
may lie at low, "normal" levels of
stored iron - so even normal levels of iron in
the body may represent a more serious risk for
cardiovascular disease than cholesterol.
By
Dr Sullivan's argument, cholesterol (and low-density
lipoproteins) constitute the loaded gun - but
nothing happens until iron pulls the trigger.
Despite
serious flaws in the case against cholesterol,
medical researchers and doctors continue to make
cholesterol the focus of their efforts to control
cardiovascular disease.
Dr
Sullivan says scientists cling to familiar theories
long after losing faith their ability to explain
what they observe in their experiments - they
will only declare a theory invalid when an alternative
candidate becomes available to take its place.
He
says the theory that heart disease is a simple
function of serum cholesterol has outlived its
usefulness, and should be abandoned. But the
cholesterol-heart disease link is so deeply entrenched
in modern medical thinking that few researchers
are able to look beyond it.
Its
dominance means that research into alternative
hypotheses are being suppressed, so patients
with high cholesterol may be receiving inappropriate
drug therapies, or pursuing rigorous diets that
provide little benefit in terms of reduced risk
of cardiovascular disease.